limitationsbreach of warranty

Thesaurus

						iLawDictionary.Com			USAConstitution Law
						California			Law Students-USL
						Law Dictionary			BankruptcyCode.US
						Actions-Accrual			United States Law.US

US Codes

State Codes

Evidence

Law Students-USL

Federal Rules of Evidence

Medical Dictionaries

A Legal and Business Portal
A Legal and Business Portal

California
Law Dictionary

A - Aa - Ab - Ac - B- C- D - E- F - G - H -I- J - L - M- N - K to Z

Statute of Limitations breach of warranty Uniform Commercial Code sec 2725(Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc.)

With regard to the limitations period, defendant incorrectly argued the complaint was time-barred by Code of Civil Procedure section 339’s two-year statute of limitations applicable to oral contracts, i.e., the salesperson’s alleged statement about the quality of the diamond. However, the applicable limitations period for breach of warranty in a contract for sale of goods is not set forth in the Code of Civil Procedure, but in California Uniform Commercial Code section 2725, which provides a four-year limitations period for “any contract for sale,” regardless of whether the contract is written or oral. (See Filmservice Laboratories, Inc. v. Harvey Bernhard Enterprises, Inc., (1989) 208 Cal.App.3d 1297, 1304 [“The term ‘any contract for sale’” as used in California Uniform Commercial Code section 2725 “includes an oral agreement”]; see also Hachten v. Stewart (1974) 42 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1, 3 [to the same effect].) There can be no legitimate question the complaint is timely under the apt statute.

Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. G0332541/12/05 CA4/3

A - Aa - Ab - Ac - B- C- D - E- F - G - H -I- J - L - M- N - K to Z
Statute of Limitations judgment as a matter of law Passage of Time-(Norgat v Upjohn)
Statute of limitations necessarily fixes a definite period(Norgart v. Upjohn Co)
Statute of limitations affirmative defense disfavored analysis (Norgart v. Upjohn Co)
Actions statute of limitations affirmative defense Norgart v Upjohn
Actions statute of limitations affirmative defense favored Norgart v Upjohn
Actions statute of limitations affirmative defense disfavored Norgart v Upjohn
Statute of limitations affirmative defense disfavored analysis (Norgart v. Upjohn Co)
Ignorant of the name of a defendant must be stated in the complaint eg Doe (Norgart v Upjohn Co)
Norgart v. Upjohn Co. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 383 , 87 Cal.Rptr.2d 453; 981 P.2d 79
Action Statute of Limitations Passage of time Prejudicial (Norgart v. Upjohn Co.)
Bruton v. United States, supra, 391 U.S. 123 [20 L.Ed.2d 476]
California: Authoritative-Law Dictionary: Table of Contents
Glossaries Directory Table of Contents
Thesaurus Directory
Dictionaries Directory Table of Contents