| Table of Contents | Financial Center | Law Journals-US | Authoritative Dictionary | Thesaurus |
|
|
iLaw Dictionary |
USAConstitution Law | |||||||
|
California |
BankruptcyCode.US | ||||||||
|
Law Dictionary |
United States Law.US | ||||||||
|
Table of Contents |
| Family Law |
![]() |
||||||||||
![]()
California
Law Dictionary
Table of Contents
iLaw Dictionary
California Law Dictionary
Table of Contents - Aa - Ab
- Ac
-
Ad - Ae
-
Af -
Ap
C
- Ca -
Cal Const
- Cg
-
Co
- Code
-
Contracts
- Cr
-
Criminal-
D -
Damages
-
E-
F
-
G
-
H -I -
J -
K -
L - M-
N -O-
P
-
Q-
R
-
S
-
T
- U - V
- To Z
U
W
Waiver Faretta-Dent
Waiver
of Immunity Defense
Waiver of Right to Counsel-Faretta-Dent
Warsaw
Convention, Accident-Husain
Welfare & Institutions Code Section 10950-Authorized Representative
When Common Law Applies Statutory Construction-Employee-Federal Statute-PERL-MWD
=========
Women's Syndrome Syndrome Domestic Violence Battered (People v. Price)
Women's Battered SyndromeViolence Syndrome Domestic (People v. Price)
Women's Syndrome Battered Syndrome Domestic Violence Battered (People v. Price)
Women's Battered Syndrome Syndrome Domestic Battered Violence (People v. Price)
=========
Workers Compensation Exclusive Remedy Rule (Mason v. Lake Dolores Group)
Workers Compensation Policy And Statutory Scheme-(Fremont Comp. Ins. v. Sierra Pine )
Workers Compensation Statutory Scheme-And Policy -(Fremont Comp. Ins. v. Sierra Pine )
Workers Compensation Scheme-Statutory -And Policy -(Fremont Comp. Ins. v. Sierra Pine )
Workers Compensation Death Benefits Award Beneficiaries-(Fremont Comp. Ins. v. Sierra Pine )
Workers Compensation Beneficiaries-Death Benefits Award (Fremont Comp. Ins. v. Sierra Pine )
Workers Compensation Benefits AwardBeneficiaries-Death (Fremont Comp. Ins. v. Sierra Pine )
Workers Compensation Award Benefits Beneficiaries-Death (Fremont Comp. Ins. v. Sierra Pine )
================
==============
Writs, All Writs Act,
28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) -(Hohn)
Writ Proper to Revew Jury Trial Denial
Writ
of Mandate Irreparable Harm-Essential kkkklll
World Wide Web - Internet-(Beverly, dba PSB
v. Network Solutions)
WWW-Internet-(Beverly, dba PSB
v. Network Solutions)bb
llll
Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15600 -Civil Protection Act,
Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult (Delaney)
Writ--Administrative Law-Discretion-Writ-(Spanner v. Rancho Santiago Comm.
College)
=
===
Waived--Appeal - Issue Waived on Appeal.(Charnley v. Blackburn)
Waiver of Failure to Object-Trial-Evidence-Criminal Law-Due Process -Exception--(People v. Partida)
Waiver of Due Process -Exception-Failure to Object-Trial-Evidence-Criminal Law--(People v. Partida)
Waiver of Due Process Object--Exception-Failure to Trial-Evidence-Criminal Law--(People v. Partida)
Waiver of Due Process Objection-Failure to Trial-Evidence-Exception-Criminal Law-(People v. Partida)
Waiver of Due Process -Failure to Trial-Evidence-Object--Exception-Criminal Law--(People v. Partida)
Waiver Evidence-Object-Exception-of Due Process -Failure to -(People v. Partida)
Waiver-Trial-Criminal Law- Evidence-Object-Exception-of Due Process-Failure to -(People v. Partida)
Waiver-Criminal Law-Trial-Evidence-Object-Exception-of-Due Process-Failure to -(People v. Partida)
Waiver-Objection-Criminal Law-Trial-Evidence-Exception-of-Due Process-Failure to-(People v. Partida)
Waiver-Due Process-Objection-Criminal Law-Trial-Evidence-Exception-of-Failure to-(People v. Partida)
Waiver-Process, Due-Objection-Criminal Law-Trial-Evidence-Exception-of-Failure to(People v. Partida)
Waiver of Issue on Appeal - Issue Waived on
Appeal.(Charnley v. Blackburn)
Web-Internet-(Beverly, dba PSB
v. Network Solutions) hh
Word-"Shall"-Statutory Interpretation -of Term "Shall" Mandatory (Estate of Miramontes-Najera)lll
World Wide Web-Internet-(Beverly, dba PSB
v. Network Solutions)
WWW-Internet-(Beverly, dba PSB
v. Network Solutions)
Wheeler Motion, Prima Facie Case of Discrimination in Jury Selection -
(Fuentes) jj
Wheeler/Baston Motion, Prima Facie Case of Discrimination in Jury Selection -
(Fuentes)
Whistleblower Case, Standard of Review--(CALMAT CO. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)
Willful-Brizuela
Willful
Failure to Fulfill Obligations Under Insurance Policy Brizuela
Without Leave to Amend- Standard of Review,-Demurrer -Milligan v. Golden
Gate Bridge
Without Leave to Amend-Standard of Review-Demurrer -(Liska v. Arns Law Firm)
Without Leave to Amend-Standard of Review-Demurrer (Coldwell Banker v. Super. Ct.)
Without Leave to Amen-Standard of Review-Demurrer-(WOLA)-(Shuer v. Co. of San Diego)
Without Leave to Amend-New Evidence Considered-Appeal-Demurrer-(Milligan v. Golden Gate Bridge)
Witness-Evidence-Testimoney-When A person is Disqualified to Be a Witness-(People
v. Gipson )
Witnesses-Criminal
Law Right to -Defendant’s Constitutional Compel the Attendance of (People v.Woods)
Witnesses-Right to
-Defendant’s Constitutional Compel the Attendance of Criminal Law (People v.Woods)
Witness-Prosecutorial Misconduct-Interference With Compulsory Process-People v. Woods
Witness-Prosecutorial Misconduct-Interference With 6th Amd. Compulsory Process-People v. Woods
holder
code
Work Product Privilege Doctrine § 2018 Code
of Civil Procedure-Attorney
Work Product Privilege Doctrine Code of Civil Procedure
§ 2018 -Attorney
Work -Attorney-Product Privilege Doctrine Code of Civil Procedure
§ 2018
Writ, Reviewable by Writ of Mandate-Summary Adjudication-Intrieri
Y
iLaw DictionaryCalifornia Law Dictionary
Z
United States Constitution
United States Constitutional-Sixth Amendment-Right to Compulsory Process-(People
v. Woods)
United States Constitution-By Section-Word
Sixth Amendment-United States Constitutional-Right to Compulsory Process-(People v. Woods)
United States Constitution-By Section -Number
6th Amendment-United States Constitutional-Right to Compulsory Process-(People v. Woods)
jjjjjj
kkk
llllllllll
Entries by Section Number
§
12(b)(6) FRCP-Motion to Dismiss Standard of Review--(Beverly, dba PSB
v. Network Solutions)
28 U.S.C., 28 § 1254(1)Certificates of Appealability - Judicial Proceeding (Hohn)
kk
§ 1254(1), 28 U.S.C., 28 Certificates of Appealability - Judicial Proceeding (Hohn)
kk
28 U.S.C. § 1651(a)-All Writs Act -(Hohn)
§ 1651, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a)-All Writs Act -(Hohn)
§ 187, subd. (a).California Penal Code Murder People v.
Taylor
§ 1280 et seq, Code Civ. Proc., -California Arbitration Act-CAA-(Aguilar
v. Lerner) mm
§ 1638, Civil Code,
Interpretation-Contract Interpretation-Language
Governs-Civ. Code, § 1638
§ 128 Judgment Motion to Vacate Code of_Civil ProcedureHardisty v Hinton & Alfert
§ 128 Code of_Civil Procedure Judgment Motion to Vacate Hardisty v Hinton & Alfert
§ 425.16 Code of Civil Procedure Standard of Review- Special Motion to Strike (Flatley v. Mauro) nn
§ 425.16 Code of Civil Procedure Special Motion to Strike Standard of Review-(Flatley v. Mauro) nn
§ 425.16 CCP Special Motion to Strike Standard of Review-(Flatley v. Mauro) nn
Property Ownership The , of is when-absolute Civ. Code, § 679(Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. )
PropertyOwnership of is when-absolute The , Civ. Code, § 679 (Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. )
Property Ownership of when- is absolute The , Civ. Code, § 679 (Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. )
Property of Ownership when-is absolute The , Civ. Code, § 679 (Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. )
Property Ownership absolute when-of is The , Civ. Code, § 679 (Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. )
Property Civ. Code, § 679-of Ownership is absolute when-The (Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. ) ,
§ 128 CCP Judgment Motion to Vacate Hardisty v Hinton & Alfert
§ 519 Penal Code section Extortion -Criminal
Law (Flatley v. Mauro)
§ 1013.5(b) Civ. Code, -Attorney Fees- Land Owner Entitled to -TREMPER v. QUINONES
§ 1013.5(b) Civil Code, -Attorney Fees- Land Owner Entitled to -TREMPER v. QUINONES
§ 128-Code of_Civil Procedure-Motion to Vacate Stipularted-Judgment (Hardisty v Hinton & Alfert)
§ 128-CCP-Motion to Vacate Stipularted-Judgment (Hardisty v Hinton & Alfert)
§ 2079. Civil.Code-Statutory Duty of Care-Prospective Purchaser of Property Coldwell Banker v Sup
§ 7611-Family Code-Presumption of Paternity Rebuttable-(In re JESUSA V)
§ 1780, subd. (d)Civ. Code,Not In Good Faith -(Corbett v. Hayward Dodge)
§ 708.180-Code of Civil Procedure Burden of Proof-Good Faith Under Corbett v. Hayward Dodge
§ 2018 Code of Civil Procedure-Attorney Work Product Privilege
Doctrine
§12940, Government Code (a)(h) Unlawful Employment Practice-FEHA- Lyle v. Warner Bros)
§ 6200-Business and Professions Code-Mandatory Fee Arbitration Act-Aguilar v. Lerner)
§998 Civil Procedure-Code of -Fees- -Offer-Settlement-Attorney --Elite Show Services v. Staffpro
§998 Code of Civil Procedure--Fees- -Offer-Settlement-Attorney --Elite Show Services v. Staffpro
§998 Settlement Offer-Attorney--Fees-Code of Civil Procedure- ---Elite Show Services v. Staffpro
§998 -Fees-Settlement Offer-Attorney-Code of Civil Procedure- ---Elite Show Services v. Staffpro
khhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
§ 5100-Contract Bid-CodeCalifornia Public (Diede Const. v. Monterey Mechanical)
§ 5100-CodeCalifornia Public Contract Bid-(Diede Const. v. Monterey Mechanical)
§ 5100-CodePublic Contract Bid-California (Diede Const. v. Monterey Mechanical)
§ 5100-Public Contract Code Bid-California (Diede Const. v. Monterey Mechanical)
Penal Code
==========
§ 1387 Penal Code
Law Rule Criminal Felony Prosecutions subject
to a two-Dismissal
(Burris v. Sup. Ct.)
§ 1387 Penal Code Law Two-Rule
subject to a Prosecutions Dismissal Felony Criminal
(Burris v. Sup. Ct.)
==
=
§ 679 Civ. Code, PropertyOwnership of is when-absolute The , (Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. )
§ 679 Civ. Code, Property Ownership of when- is absolute The , (Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. )
§ 679 Civ. Code, Property of Ownership when-is absolute The , (Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. )
§ 679 Civ. Code, Property Ownership absolute when-of is The (Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. )
§ 679-Civ.Code, ofProperty Ownership is absolute when-The (Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. ) ,
=
§ 40300.5 Vehicle Code Criminal Law Driving Drunk Arrest Presence exception Troppman_v_Gourley
§ 40300.5 Vehicle Code Criminal Law DUI Drunk Arrest DrivingPresence exception Troppman_v_Gourley
==
§1689 Contracts-Rescission
California Civil Code section (Schauer v.
Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. )
§1689 RescissionContracts-California Civil Code section (Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. )
§1689 ContractsRescission -California Civil Code section (Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. )
§1689 Rescission section Contracts California Civil Code - (Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc. )
===========
=========
=
§ 1559-Civil Code Section Expressly defined-California (Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc.)
§ Civil 1559-Code California Section Expressly defined-(Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc.)
-§ Section 1559 Civil Code Expressly defined-California (Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc.)
§ 1559 Civil Code California Expressly defined-Section-(Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of Cal., Inc.)
==
====
==========
=================
§1671-Civil Code Contracts Liquidated Damages (Morris v Redwood Empire Bancorp)
§ 1671 Civil Code Damages Liquidated
Contracts-(Morris v Redwood Empire Bancorp)
======
§ 17200 Bus. & Prof. Code, Competition-Unfair Defined-Morris v. Redwood Empire Bancorp)
§ 17200 Bus. & Prof. Code, Competition-Defined-Unfair Morris v. Redwood Empire Bancorp)
§ 17200 Bus. & Prof. Code, Competition-Unfair Defined-Morris v. Redwood Empire Bancorp)
========
==========
§13353
Vehicle Code sec Implied Consent Criminal Law Drunk Driving (Troppman v. Gourle)
§ 13353 Vehicle Code sec Implied Consent Drunk Driving
Criminal Law (Troppman v. Gourle)
§ 13353 Vehicle Code sec Drunk Driving
Criminal Law Consent Implied (Troppman v. Gourle)
=======
§1235, Evidence Code Implied assertions are hearsayCriminal Law-Hearsay-Evidence (People v. Morgan)
§1235, EvidenceCode Hearsay Criminal Law-Hearsay-Evidence Implied assertions are (People v. Morgan)
§1235,Evidence Code Hearsay-Criminal Law-Implied assertions are hearsayEvidence (People v. Morgan)
§1235, Evidence Code Implied assertions are hearsay Evidence Hearsay-Criminal Law-(People v. Morgan)
§1235, Hearsay-Implied assertions are hearsay Evidence Code Criminal Law-Evidence (People v. Morgan)
============
§ 801Testimony Code,Evid. Admissability Criminal Law Evidence-Expert Witness People v. Price)
§ 801 Evidence-Code,Testimony Evid. Criminal Law Expert Witness Admissability People v. Price)
§ 801 Evid. Code,Testimony Expert Evidence-Admissability Criminal Law Witness People v. Price)
§ 801 Evid. Code,Criminal Law Testimony Witness Expert Evidence-Admissability People v. Price)
§ 801A Testimony Witness Expert Evidence-dmissability Criminal Law Evid. Code, People v. Price)
§ 801, Evidence-Code Admissability Testimony Evid. Criminal Law Witness Expert People v. Price)
====
§ 519 Penal Code Section -Tort Extortion (Flatley v. Mauro)
§ 1240-California Evidence-Code Hearsay Exception-Spontaneous Statements-People v. Cage
Unlawful Employment Practice-FEHA-Government Code sec12940,(a)(h)(Lyle v. Warner Bros)
=====
§ 359 Code Insurance Contracts Rescission Based on Misrepresentation Mitchell v. United Nat. Ins.)
§ 359Code Insurance
Rescission Based on Contracts MisrepresentationMitchell v. United Nat. Ins.)
§ 359 Code Insurance Rescission Contracts
Misrepresentation Based on Mitchell v. United Nat. Ins.)
§ 359 Code Insurance Rescission Based on
Misrepresentation Contracts Mitchell v. United Nat. Ins.)
==========
§1054-Penal Code-Reciprocal Discovery-Criminal Penal Code Section 1054--(Teal v. Super)
§ Amendment US Const.
Punishment-Constitutional Law, -Cruel and Unusual --(People v. Jefferson)
§ 8-Local Rule First Appellate Requirements (Hardisty v. Hinton & Alfert)
8-Local Rule First Appellate Requirements (Hardisty v. Hinton & Alfert)
6th Amendment US Constitution-Criminal Law Constitutional Right Apprendi Rule-People_v_Prieto
14th Amendment US Constitution-Criminal Law Constitutional Right Apprendi Rule-People_v_Prieto
==========
§ 6600Welf. & Inst. Code, Criminal Law-Sexually Violent Predators Act-(In
re Wright)
§ 6600 Welf. & Inst. Code, Criminal Law-Sexually Violent Predators Act-(In re
Wright)
§ 6600 Welf. & Inst. Code, Criminal Law-Violent Predators Act-Sexually -(In re
Wright)
§ 6600 Welf. & Inst. Criminal Law-Code, Sexually Violent Predators Act-(In re
Wright) ==========
Constitutional Right of Self-Representation-Criminal Defendant
============
6th Amend-Right to a speedy trial Criminal Law -Constitutional LawTrial -US Const People_v_Lowe
6th Amend-Right to a speedy trial Constitutional Law Criminal Law -Trial US Const People_v_Lowe
6th Amend-Right Constitutional Law Criminal Law -to a speedy trial Trial US Const People_v_Lowe
6th Amend-Right to Criminal Law -speedy trial, a Constitutional Trial US Const People_v_Lowe
=======
6th Amend. Const. U.S. Counsel Ineffetive Criminal Law Right to Assistance People v. Price)
6th Amend. Const. U.S. Right to Counsel Assistance IneffetiveCriminal LawPeople v. Price)
6th Amend.Const.U.S . Ineffetive Criminal Law Right to Counsel Assistance People v. Price)
6th Amend.Const. U.S. IneffetiveAsssistance Right to Counsel Criminal Law People v. Price)
========
==========
=======
===
===
6th Amend U.S. Const. Evidence-Hearsay .Crawford v. Washington Criminal Law (People v. Price)
6th Amend. U.S. Const. Crawford v. Washington Criminal Law Evidence-Hearsay (People v. Price)
6th Amend. U.S. Const. Hearsay Evidence-Crawford v. Washington Criminal Law (People v. Price)
6th Amend.U.S. Const. Evidence-Criminal Law Crawford v. Washington Hearsay (People v. Price)
=======
=======
====
==== ===========
6th Amend Constitutional Law Right to a Speedy Trial-indefinitely suspensionCriminal Law - KLOPFER v. NORTH CAROLINA
6th Amend Constitutional Law Trial -Speedy Right to a Criminal Law indefinitely suspension -KLOPFER v. NORTH CAROLINA
6th Constitutional Law-Criminal Law Speedy trial Right to a indefinitely suspension -KLOPFER v. NORTH CAROLINA
============
§ 17200 Bus. & Prof. Code, Competition-Unfair Defined-Morris v. Redwood Empire Bancorp)
§ 17200 Bus. & Prof. Code, Competition-Defined-Unfair Morris v. Redwood Empire Bancorp)
§ 17200 Bus. & Prof. Code, Competition-Unfair Defined-Morris v. Redwood Empire Bancorp)
========
6th Constitutional Law Speedy trial Right to a Trial Criminal Law --(KLOPFER v. NORTH CAROLINA)
===================
===========
6th Amend Trial Right to a -Criminal Law Constitutional Law -Duty-State Speedy trial-(Smith v Hooey)
6th Amend Trial -State Duty-Constitutional Law Criminal Law -Right to a Speedy trial-(Smith v Hooey)
============
Art 1 § 15 cl. 1-Cal Const Right to Criminal Law -speedy trial, a Constitutional TrialPeople_v_Lowe
===========
==========
§ 7.4000(a)(2).12 ( C.F.R.)Powers Examination-Bank Visitorial Morris v. Redwood Empire Bancorp
§ 7.4000(a)(2).) (12 C.F.R. Powers Examination-BankVisitorial Morris v. Redwood Empire Bancorp
§ 7.4000(a)(2).) (12 C.F.R. PowersVisitorial Examination-Bank Morris v. Redwood Empire Bancorp
§ 7.4000(a)(2).) (12 C.F.R. Powers -Bank Examination-Visitorial Morris v. Redwood Empire Bancorp
§ 7.4000(a)(2).)Powers (12 C.F.R. -Bank Visitorial Examination-Morris v. Redwood Empire Bancorp