Home

Table of Contents

 Table of Forms   Law Journals-US

Authoritative Dictionary

 Courts

 Thesaurus
         

iLaw Dictionary

    USAConstitution Law
         

California

    BankruptcyCode.US
         

Law Dictionary

    iBusiness Center.US
         

Statutory Construction

    United States Law.US

US Codes

  State Codes

  Evidence

   Law Students-USL

News

Entertainment

Medical Dictionaries

                                                 
      
A Legal and Business Portal-Home Page
   

   
                 
                 

                         

iLaw Dictionary
California
Law Dictionary
Statutory Construction

 

Statutory Construction-Federal Act

As to contracting agencies, the PERL gives the term no special meaning, stating simply thatemployee means “[a]ny person in the employ of any contracting agency.”  (§ 20028, subd. (b).)  In this circumstance—a statute referring to employees without defining the term—courts have generally applied the common law test of employment.  “ ‘[W]here Congress uses terms that have accumulated settled meaning under . . . the common law, a court must infer, unless the statute otherwise dictates, that Congress means to incorporate the established meaning of these terms.’  [Citations.]  In the past, when Congress has used the term ‘employee’ without defining it, we have concluded that Congress intended to describe the conventional master-servant relationship as understood by common-law agency doctrine.”  (Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid (1989) 490 U.S. 730, 739-740, italics added; accord, People v. Palma (1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 1559, 1565-1566 [“as a general rule, when ‘employee’ is used in a statute without a definition, the Legislature intended to adopt the common law definition and to exclude independent contractors”].)  California courts have applied this interpretive rule to various statutes dealing with public and private employment.[5]  The federal courts have applied it specifically to the question of qualification for retirement benefits.[6]  Unless given reason to conclude the Legislature must have intended the term to have a different meaning in section 20028, subdivision (b), we also can only adhere to the common law test.  We proceed to consider MWD’s and the labor suppliers’ arguments for a contrary reading of the PERL.  
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA,  v THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, S102371-Filed 2/26/04

===========================================================================


Thomas - Legislative Information on the Internet |Check Your Credit Score
Directory of Medical Dictionaries: Table of Contents |
California Injury (Torts) Law
USA Entertainment.US | FederalCriminalProcedure.Com |starUnited States News
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | iLaw Dictionary.ComLibrary of Congress
United States Law Consumer Law TITLE PAGE | USA Entertainment.US
iBusiness Center.US |
United States Law: Constitutional Law: Constitutions of  The World: TITLE PAGE
California Contracts Law.Com | California Injury (Torts) Law | Advanced Trial Handbook
Phone Directories From Around the World New | California Law Revision Commission    
California Civil Procedure.Com | Federal Civil Procedure.Com


Copyright 2003 by  © - iLawDictionary.Com™©  All Rights Reserved