| Table of Forms | Law Journals-US | Thesaurus |
|
|
iLaw Dictionary |
USAConstitution Law | |||||||
|
California |
BankruptcyCode.US | ||||||||
|
Law Dictionary |
iBusiness Center.US | ||||||||
|
Statutory Construction |
United States Law.US |
| Evidence |
![]() |
||||||||||
iLaw Dictionary
California
Law Dictionary
Statutory Construction
Statutory Construction-Federal Act
As to contracting agencies, the PERL
gives the term no special meaning, stating simply that “employee” means “[a]ny
person in the employ of any contracting agency.” (§ 20028, subd. (b).) In
this circumstance—a statute referring to employees without defining the
term—courts have generally applied the common law test of employment.
“ ‘[W]here
Congress uses terms that have accumulated settled meaning under . . . the
common law, a court must infer, unless the statute otherwise dictates, that
Congress means to incorporate the established meaning of these terms.’
[Citations.] In the past, when Congress has used the term ‘employee’
without defining it, we have concluded that Congress intended to describe the
conventional master-servant relationship as understood by common-law agency
doctrine.” (Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid
(1989) 490 U.S. 730, 739-740, italics added; accord, People v. Palma
(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 1559, 1565-1566 [“as a general rule, when ‘employee’ is
used in a statute without a definition, the Legislature intended to adopt the
common law definition and to exclude independent contractors”].) California
courts have applied this interpretive rule to various statutes dealing with
public and private employment.[5]
The federal courts have applied it specifically to the question of
qualification for retirement benefits.[6]
Unless given reason to conclude the Legislature must have intended the term to
have a different meaning in section 20028, subdivision (b), we also can only
adhere to the common law test. We proceed to consider MWD’s and the labor
suppliers’ arguments for a contrary reading of the PERL.
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, v THE
SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, S102371-Filed
2/26/04
![]()
===========================================================================
![]()
Thomas - Legislative Information on the Internet
|
Check Your Credit Score
Directory of Medical Dictionaries: Table of Contents | California Injury (Torts) Law
USA Entertainment.US |
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com
|
United
States News
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com
|
iLaw
Dictionary.Com | Library of Congress
United States Law Consumer Law TITLE PAGE |
USA Entertainment.US
iBusiness
Center.US |
United States Law: Constitutional Law: Constitutions of The
World: TITLE PAGE
California
Contracts Law.Com | California Injury (Torts) Law
|
Advanced Trial Handbook
Phone Directories From Around the World New |
California Law Revision Commission
California Civil
Procedure.Com |
Federal
Civil Procedure.Com
Copyright 2003 by
™©
- iLawDictionary.Com™© All Rights Reserved