Home

Table of Contents  Table of Forms   Law Journals-US  FRCP-Appendix of Forms

 Courts

  Glossaries
     

iLaw Dictionary

      USAConstitution Law
     

California

      BankruptcyCode.US
     

Law Dictionary

      iBusiness Center.US
     

Standing

      United States Law.US

US Codes

  State Codes

  Evidence

| Law Students-USL

| Federal Civil Procedure-Main Page

Medical Dictionaries

                                                 
      
A Legal and Business Portal-Home Page
   

   
                 
                 

                         

iLaw Dictionary
California
Law Dictionary
 
Standing

Standing

Standing is a judicially-created doctrine -- "an essential
and unchanging part of the case-or-controversy requirement
of Article III." Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555,
560 (1992). "No principle is more fundamental to the judiciary's
proper role in our system of government than the constitutional
limitation of federal-court jurisdiction to actual casesor controversies.
" Simon v. Eastern Ky. Welfare Rights Org., 426 U.S. 26, 37 (1976).
Standing, unlike other jurisdictional doctrines, " `focuses on the party
seeking to get his complaint before a federal court and not on the issues
he wishes to have adjudicated.' " Id. at 38 (quoting Flast v. Cohen, 392
U.S. 83,99 (1968)). To demonstrate standing, a plaintiff must (1)
"have suffered an `injury in fact' -- an invasion of a legally
protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized and
(b) `actual or imminent, not `conjectural or hypothetical;' "
(2) "there must be a causal connection between the injury and
the conduct complained of -- the injury has to be`fairly . . .
trace[able] to the challenged action of the defendant, and not
. . . th[e] result [of] the independent action of some third party
not before the court;' " and (3) "it must be `likely' as opposed
to merely `speculative,' that the injury will be`redressed by
a favorable decision.' " Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. at
560-61 (citations omitted) (alterations in original).

Opinion citing this authority is below:
PRITIKIN v. DEP'T OF ENERGY, No 99-35581 (9th Cir. June 13, 2001) 

CIVIL PROCEDURE, ENVIRONMENTAL LAW

    PRITIKIN v. DEP'T OF ENERGY, No 99-35581 (9th Cir. June 13, 2001)
    Plaintiff who sought medical monitoring from Agency for Toxic
    Subtances and Disease Registry lacked standing to sue Department of
    Energy to force the department to fund agency's monitoring program
    under the citizen's suit provision of CERCLA.

    To read the full text of this opinion, go to: [PDF File]
    http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/9935581p.pdf
    PRITIKIN v. DEP'T OF ENERGY, No 99-35581 (9th Cir. June 13, 2001)
     PRITIKIN v. DEP'T OF ENERGY, No 99-35581 (9th Cir. June 13, 2001-Annotated)


Thomas - Legislative Information on the Internet | Check Your Credit Score
Directory of Medical Dictionaries: Table of Contents |
California Injury (Torts) Law
USA Entertainment.US | FederalCriminalProcedure.Com |
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | iLaw Dictionary.Com Library of Congress
United States Law Consumer Law TITLE PAGE | USA Entertainment.US
iBusiness Center.US |
United States Law: Constitutional Law: Constitutions of  The World: TITLE PAGE
California Contracts Law.Com | California Injury (Torts) Law
Phone Directories From Around the World New | California Law Revision Commission

Copyright 2003 by  © - iLawDictionary.Com™©  All Rights Reserved