Home

Table of Contents

 Table of Forms   Law Journals-US  Authoritative Dictionary

 Courts

  Thesaurus
         

iLaw Dictionary

    USAConstitution Law
         

California

    BankruptcyCode.US
         

Law Dictionary

    iBusiness Center.US
         

 Standard of Review

    United States Law.US

US Codes

  State Codes

  Evidence

   Law Students-USL

 News

Entertainment

Medical Dictionaries

                                                 
      
A Legal and Business Portal-Home
   

   
                 
                 

 

iLaw Dictionary
California
Law Dictionary
Standard of Review
Summary Judgment
(Walt Disney)

 

Standard of Review-Summary Judgment
(Walt Disney)

DISCUSSION

1.         Standard of Review

On appeal from a summary judgment, we make “an independent assessment of the correctness of the trial court’s ruling, applying the same legal standard as the trial court in determining whether there are any genuine issues of material fact or whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.  [Citations.]”  (Iverson v. Muroc Unified School Dist. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 218, 222.)  In our review, we strictly construe the moving party’s evidence and liberally construe the opposing party’s, accepting as undisputed only those portions of the moving party’s evidence that are uncontradicted.  “Only when the inferences are indisputable may the court decide the issues as a matter of law.  If the evidence is in conflict, the factual issues must be resolved by trial.  ‘Any doubts about the propriety of summary judgment . . . are generally resolved against granting the motion, because that allows the future development of the case and avoids errors.’  [Citation.]”  (Binder v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 832, 839.)

The trial court properly found no triable issues of material fact; none of the parties assert that such issues exist.  The questions before this court are questions of law. Long v. Walt Disney Co. B164750 Mar 09 2004 
 

spacer bar
 

========================================================================


(Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843.)  
Brizuela v. Calfarm Ins. 3/3/04 CA2/5 B160875 uuuuu
(Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843.)  
Brizuela v. Calfarm Ins. 3/3/04 CA2/5 B160875    
Long v. Walt Disney Co. B164750 Mar 09 2004 
Purpose of Summary Judgment-(Aguilar)   
Purpose of Summary Judgment-Brizuela


Thomas - Legislative Information on the Internet |Check Your Credit Score
Directory of Medical Dictionaries: Table of Contents |
California Injury (Torts) Law
USA Entertainment.US | FederalCriminalProcedure.Com |star United Statea News
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | iLaw Dictionary.Com Library of Congress
United States Law Consumer Law TITLE PAGE | USA Entertainment.US
iBusiness Center.US |
United States Law: Constitutional Law: Constitutions of  The World: TITLE PAGE
California Contracts Law.Com | California Injury (Torts) Law
Phone Directories From Around the World New | California Law Revision Commission 
California Civil Procedure.Com | Federal Civil Procedure.Com



Copyright 2003 by  © - iLawDictionary.Com™©  All Rights Reserved