| Table of Forms | Law Journals-US | Authoritative Dictionary | Thesaurus |
|
|
iLaw Dictionary |
USAConstitution Law | |||||||
|
California |
BankruptcyCode.US | ||||||||
|
Law Dictionary |
iBusiness Center.US | ||||||||
|
Negligence-Common Law |
United States Law.US |
| Evidence |
![]() |
||||||||||
![]()
iLaw Dictionary
California
Law Dictionary
Negligence-General-Common Law
(Flowers v. Torrance)
Negligence-General-Common Law
(Flowers v. Torrance)
[2] "[N]egligence is conduct which falls below the standard established by
law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm." (Rest.2d
Torts, § 282.) Thus, as a general proposition one "is required to exercise the
care that a person of ordinary prudence would exercise under the circumstances."
fn. 2 (Polk v. City of Los Angeles (1945)
26
Cal.2d 519, 525 [159 P.2d 931]; Rowland v. Christian (1968)
69
Cal.2d 108 [70 Cal.Rptr. 97, 443 P.2d 561, 32 A.L.R.3d 496]; see Civ. Code,
§ 1714, subd. (a).) Because application of this principle is inherently
situational, the amount of care deemed reasonable in any particular case will
vary, while at the same time the standard of conduct itself remains constant,
i.e., due care commensurate with the risk posed by the conduct taking into
consideration all relevant circumstances. (Dalzell v. County of Los Angeles
(1948)
88 Cal.App.2d 271, 276 [198 P.2d 554]; Lasater v. Oakland Scavenger Co.
(1945)
71 Cal.App.2d 217, 221 [162 P.2d 486].) " 'There are no "degrees" of care,
as a matter of law; there are only different amounts of care, as a matter of
fact ....' [Citation.]" (Donnelly v. Southern Pacific Co. (1941)
18
Cal.2d 863, 871 [118 P.2d 465].) "Persons dealing with dangerous
instrumentalities involving great risk of harm must exercise a greater amount of
care than persons acting in less responsible capacities, but the former are no
more negligent than the latter for failing to exercise the required care.
[Citation.]" (Ibid.; cf. Polk v. City of Los Angeles, supra, 26 Cal.2d at p. 535
[applying the same measure of the standard of care to the former rule of
contributory negligence].)
Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992 , 35
Cal.Rptr.2d 685; 884
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thomas - Legislative Information on the
Internet |
Check
Your Credit Score
Directory of Medical Dictionaries: Table of Contents |
California Injury (Torts) Law
USA Entertainment.US |
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com
|
United Statea News
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com
|
iLaw
Dictionary.Com | Library of Congress
United States Law Consumer Law TITLE PAGE |
USA Entertainment.US
iBusiness Center.US |
United States Law: Constitutional Law: Constitutions of The World:
TITLE PAGE
California
Contracts Law.Com |
California Injury (Torts) Law
Phone Directories From Around the World New |
California Law Revision Commission
California Civil
Procedure.Com |
Federal
Civil Procedure.Com
Copyright 2003 by
™©
- iLawDictionary.Com™© All Rights Reserved