| Table of Forms | Law Journals-US | Authoritative Dictionary | Thesaurus |
|
|
iLaw Dictionary |
USAConstitution Law | |||||||
|
California |
BankruptcyCode.US | ||||||||
|
Law Dictionary |
iBusiness Center.US | ||||||||
|
Judicial Decision |
United States Law.US |
| Evidence |
![]() |
||||||||||
![]()
iLaw Dictionary
California
Law Dictionary
Judicial Decision Later-Enacted Statutes
Judicial Decision Later-Enacted Statutes
Plaintiffs
invoke the rule that when a term has been given a particular meaning by a
judicial decision, it should be presumed to have the same meaning in
later-enacted statutes or constitutional provisions. (See People v. Hurtado
(2002) 28 Cal.4th 1179, 1188-1189; Arnett v. Dal Cielo (1996) 14 Cal.4th
4, 19.) Plaintiffs argue that San Marcos, supra, 42 Cal.3d 154, gave the
term “assessment” a precise legal meaning as applying to capacity charges used
to fund capital improvements, and therefore the term “assessment” in article
XIII D, enacted after San Marcos, must be construed to have the same
meaning. But the rule that plaintiffs invoke does not apply when, as here, the
statute or constitutional provision contains its own definition of the term at
issue: “If the Legislature has provided an express definition of a term, that
definition ordinarily is binding on the courts.” (Curle v. Superior Court
(2001) 24 Cal.4th 1057, 1063.) Here, article XIII D provides both an express
definition of assessment and an implied qualification of that definition through
the requirement that the agency identify the specific parcels on which the
assessment will be imposed.
JERRY RICHMOND et al., v. SHASTA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, S105078-Filed 2/9/04
![]()
=======================================================
Copyright 2003 by
™©
- iLawDictionary.Com™© All Rights Reserved