Home

Table of Contents

 Table of Forms

 Law Journals-US

Authoritative Dictionary

Courts

  Thesaurus
         

iLaw Dictionary

    USAConstitution Law
         

California

    Law Students-USL
         

Law Dictionary

    BankruptcyCode.US
         

Exclusionary Rule

    United States Law.US

US Codes

 State Codes

Evidence

 Law Students-USL

 Federal Civil Procedure-Main Page

 Medical Dictionaries
                                                 
      
A Legal and Business Portal-Home Page
   

   
                 
                 

iLaw Dictionary
California
Law Dictionary
Evidence-Exclusionary Rule
(People v. Bowers)

Evidence-Exclusionary Rule-Purpose
(People v. Bowers)

Contrary to respondent’s contention, the rationale of Sanders similarly applies as strongly to an unlawful personal search of an individual on a public street as to an unlawful search of a residence.  The Fourth Amendment applies as much to the protection of “persons” against unreasonable search and seizure as it does to residences.  Sanders’ concern is with preventing officers from executing searches without having contemporaneous knowledge of the circumstances justifying such a search.  That concern applies equally to both personal and residential searches.  (See United States v. Calandra (1974) 414 U.S. 338, 347 [“The exclusionary rule was adopted to effectuate the Fourth Amendment right of all citizens ‘to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures’ ” (italics added)]; Terry v. Ohio (1968) 392 U.S. 1, 16-17 [“[I]t is simply fantastic to urge that such a [stop and frisk] procedure performed in public by a policeman while the citizen stands helpless, perhaps facing a wall with his hands raised, is a ‘petty indignity.’  It is a serious intrusion upon the sanctity of the person, which may inflict great indignity and arouse strong resentment, and it is not to be undertaken lightly”].)  From this, we infer that the Supreme Court’s disapproval in Sanders of retroactive justification of a warrantless search of a residence due to a suspect’s search condition, of which the searching officers were unaware at the time, applies as well to a similarly unlawful warrantless search of a suspect’s actual person.

People v. Bowers 4/23/04 CA1/3 A095890exclusionary rule
P. v. Bowers 4/23/04 CA1/3 A095890Detailed case information

spacer bar



Thomas - Legislative Information on the Internet |Check Your Credit Score
Directory of Medical Dictionaries: Table of Contents |
California Injury (Torts) Law
USA Entertainment.US | FederalCriminalProcedure.Com |starUnited Statea News
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | iLaw Dictionary.ComLibrary of Congress
United States Law Consumer Law TITLE PAGE | USA Entertainment.US
iBusiness Center.US |
United States Law: Constitutional Law: Constitutions of  The World: TITLE PAGE
California Contracts Law.Com | California Injury (Torts) Law
Phone Directories From Around the World New | California Law Revision Commission 
California Civil Procedure.Com | Federal Civil Procedure.Comkk   
Yaazoo!


Copyright 2003 by  © - iLawDictionary.Com™©  All Rights Reserved