Home

Table of Contents

 Table of Forms

 Law Journals-US

Authoritative Dictionary

Courts

  Thesaurus
         

iLaw Dictionary

    USAConstitution Law
         

California

    Law Students-USL
         

Law Dictionary

    BankruptcyCode.US
         

Trial-Jury Instructions

    United States Law.US

US Codes

 State Codes

Evidence

 Law Students-USL

 Federal Civil Procedure-Main Page

 Medical Dictionaries
                                                 
      
A Legal and Business Portal-Home Page
   

   
                 
                 

iLaw Dictionary
California
Law Dictionary
  
Criminal Trial-Jury Instructions
     (
People v. Barajas)



Criminal Trial-
Jury instructions Trial Court Duty
(People v. Barajas)

DISCUSSION

I.          Jury instructions

            Defendant argues that the court erred in failing or refusing to give three jury instructions.  In a criminal trial, the court must give an instruction requested by a party if the instruction correctly states the law and relates to a material question upon which there is evidence substantial enough to merit consideration.  (People v. Avena (1996) 13 Cal.4th 394, 424; People v. Wickersham (1982) 32 Cal.3d 307, 324, overruled on other grounds by People v. Barton (1995) 12 Cal.4th 186, 201.)  The court must also give some instructions sua sponte:

“‘[E]ven in the absence of a request, a trial court must instruct on the general principles of law governing the case, i.e., those principles relevant to the issues raised by the evidence, but need not instruct on specific points developed at trial. “The most rational interpretation of the phrase ‘general principles of law governing the case’ would seem to be as those principles of law commonly or closely and openly connected with the facts of the case before the court.” [Citations.]’”  (People v. Michaels (2002) 28 Cal.4th 486, 529-530.)

The court has no duty to give an instruction if it is repetitious of another instruction also given.  (People v. Turner (1994) 8 Cal.4th 137, 203.)  “‘“[T]he correctness of jury instructions is to be determined from the entire charge of the court, not from a consideration of parts of an instruction or from a particular instruction.”’”  (People v. Musselwhite (1998) 17 Cal.4th 1216, 1248.) 

People v. BarajasF041273 error was harmless imperfect self-defense

Date Posted
 
Docket #/
File Format
 
Description

 

Jul 15 2004 F041273
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Barajas 7/15/04 CA5 Detailed case information

 

spacer bar
 


California: Authoritative-Law Dictionary: Table of Contents    
Glossaries Directory Table of Contents   
Thesaurus Directory  
Dictionaries Directory Table of Contents

 


Thomas - Legislative Information on the Internet |Check Your Credit Score | UN Treaty Reference Guide
Directory of Medical Dictionaries: Table of Contents |
California Injury (Torts) Law | Yaazoo!
USA Entertainment.US | FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | United Statea News | California Discovery
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | iLaw Dictionary.Com |
Library of Congress | California Appeals
United States Law Consumer Law TITLE PAGE | USA Entertainment.US |
starUnited States News
iBusiness Center.US | United States Law: Constitutional Law: Constitutions of  The World: TITLE PAGE
California Contracts Law.Com | California Injury (Torts) Law | Advanced Trial Handbook | California Legal Forms
Phone Directories From Around the World New | California Law Revision Commission | California Writs
California Civil Procedure.Com | Advanced Trial Handbook-Ervin A. Gonzalez, Esq.
Yaazoo! | Abogados Latinos | Agogados De Accidentes  | United States History | Spanish


Copyright 2003 by  © - iLawDictionary.Com™©  All Rights Reserved