Home

Table of Contents

 Table of Forms

 Law Journals-US

Authoritative Dictionary

Courts

  Thesaurus
         

iLaw Dictionary

    USAConstitution Law
         

California

    Law Students-USL
         

Law Dictionary

    BankruptcyCode.US
         

Right to Counsel-Evidence

    United States Law.US

US Codes

 State Codes

Evidence

 Law Students-USL

 Federal Civil Procedure-Main Page

 Medical Dictionaries
                                                 
      
A Legal and Business Portal-Home Page
   

   
                 
                 

iLaw Dictionary
California
Law Dictionary
Evidence Seized in Violation of Right to Counsel Not Admissible
(Massiah v United)
A - B- C- D - E- F - G - H -I- J - L - M- K to Z       


Evidence Seized in Violation of Right to Counsel Not Admissible
(Massiah v United)

 Under Massiah, the prosecution may not use evidence obtained in violation of the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel.  (Massiah v. United States, supra, 377 U.S. at p. 207.) In Massiah v. United States, supra, 377 U.S.  the court stated:

"Government agents, while continuing to investigate narcotics activities including those of petitioner, who had retained a lawyer and was free on bail after indictment, without petitioner's knowledge secured an alleged confederate's consent to install a radio transmitter in the latter's automobile. An agent was thereby enabled to overhear petitioner's damaging statements which, despite his objection, were used in the trial which resulted in his conviction. Held: Incriminating statements thus deliberately elicited by federal agents from the petitioner, in the absence of his attorney, deprived the petitioner of his right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment; therefore such statements could not constitutionally be used as evidence against him in his trial. Pp. 201-207.
307 F.2d 62, reversed."

Massiah v. United States (1964) 377 U.S. 201                               

U.S. Supreme Court
MASSIAH v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 201 (1964)
377 U.S. 201
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 199. -Argued March 3, 1964. -Decided May 18, 1964.

spacer bar
 


A - B- C- D - E- F - G - H -I- J - L - M- K to Z --
California: Authoritative-Law Dictionary: Table of Contents    
Glossaries Directory Table of Contents   
Thesaurus Directory  
Dictionaries Directory Table of Contents 
Cases citing this case: Supreme Court-Massiah v United States nn   
Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts-Massiah v United States


Thomas - Legislative Information on the Internet |Check Your Credit Score | UN Treaty Reference Guide
Directory of Medical Dictionaries: Table of Contents |
California Injury (Torts) Law | Yaazoo!
USA Entertainment.US | FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | United Statea News | California Discovery
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | iLaw Dictionary.Com |
Library of Congress | California Appeals
United States Law Consumer Law TITLE PAGE | USA Entertainment.US |
starUnited States News
iBusiness Center.US | United States Law: Constitutional Law: Constitutions of  The World: TITLE PAGE
California Contracts Law.Com | California Injury (Torts) Law | Advanced Trial Handbook | California Legal Forms
Phone Directories From Around the World New | California Law Revision Commission | California Writs
California Civil Procedure.Com | Advanced Trial Handbook-Ervin A. Gonzalez, Esq.
Yaazoo! | Abogados Latinos | Agogados De Accidentes  | United States History | Spanish


Copyright 2003 by  © - iLawDictionary.Com™©  All Rights Reserved