Home

Table of Contents

 Table of Forms

 Law Journals-US

Authoritative Dictionary

Courts

  Thesaurus
         

iLaw Dictionary

    USAConstitution Law
         

California

    Law Students-USL
         

Law Dictionary

    BankruptcyCode.US
         

Consumer Law -Song Beverly Act

    United States Law.US

US Codes

 State Codes

Evidence

 Law Students-USL

 Federal Civil Procedure-Main Page

 Medical Dictionaries
                                                 
      
A Legal and Business Portal-Home Page
   

   
                 
                 

 

iLaw Dictionary
California
Law Dictionary
Consumer Law -Song-Beverly Act
(Gavaldon v. DaimlerChrysler  )

 

Consumer Law-Song-Beverly Act-Civil Code section 1791-Service Contract Not Express Warranty
(Gavaldon v. DaimlerChrysler)

 The Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (hereafter sometimes the Act or the Song-Beverly Act), Civil Code section 1791 et seq.,[1] provides, in section 1793.2, subdivision (d)(2), that when a manufacturer does not repair a motor vehicle to conform to an express warranty after “a reasonable number of attempts,” the buyer may opt to have the item replaced, or may return the item and obtain restitution for its cost (hereafter sometimes the replacement/restitution remedy).  In the present case, the trial court found that plaintiff Rosemarie Gavaldon’s Dodge Caravan minivan was substantially impaired because of a defective transmission that defendant DaimlerChrysler Corporation and its representatives (hereafter DaimlerChrysler) had been unable to repair after numerous attempts.  The court found that the defect arose after the expiration of Gavaldon’s 3‑year/36,000-mile warranty.  Nonetheless, the court concluded that Gavaldon was entitled to section 1792.3, subdivision (d)’s replacement/restitution remedy because the transmission defect was covered by Gavaldon’s 7-year/70,000-mile service contract, and that, for purposes of the Song-Beverly Act, a service contract was a type of express warranty.  The trial court therefore awarded Gavaldon the purchase price of the vehicle, minus the value attributed to its past use (see § 1792.3, subd. (d)(2)(C)), for a total of $13,623.63, plus attorney fees provided under the Act.  The Court of Appeal disagreed and reversed the trial court’s award.  Gavaldon’s petition for review calls on us to decide whether a service contract is an express warranty within the meaning of the Act.  We conclude that it is not.

Gavaldon v. DaimlerChrysler S104477Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act

 

May 27 2004 S104477
[PDF] [DOC]
Gavaldon v. DaimlerChrysler 5/27/04 SCS104477 Detailed case information

 

spacer bar
 


California: Authoritative-Law Dictionary: Table of Contents mm  
Glossaries Directory Table of Contents   
Thesaurus Directory   
Dictionaries Directory Table of Contents


Thomas - Legislative Information on the Internet | Check Your Credit Score
Directory of Medical Dictionaries: Table of Contents |
California Injury (Torts) Law
USA Entertainment.US | FederalCriminalProcedure.Com |
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | iLaw Dictionary.Com Library of Congress
United States Law Consumer Law TITLE PAGE | USA Entertainment.US
iBusiness Center.US |
United States Law: Constitutional Law: Constitutions of  The World: TITLE PAGE
California Contracts Law.Com | California Injury (Torts) Law
Phone Directories From Around the World New | California Law Revision Commission  
California Civil Procedure.Com | Federal Civil Procedure.Com    
Yaazoo


Copyright 2003 by  © - iLawDictionary.Com™©  All Rights Reserved