| Table of Forms | Thesaurus |
|
|
iLaw Dictionary |
USAConstitution Law | |||||||
|
California |
Law Students-USL | ||||||||
|
Law Dictionary |
BankruptcyCode.US | ||||||||
|
Collateral Order Doctrine |
United States Law.US |
| Medical Dictionaries |
![]() |
||||||||||
![]()
iLaw Dictionary
California
Law Dictionary
Collateral Order Doctrine
(COHEN V. BENEFICIAL INDUS. LOAN CORP)
Appealable-Collateral Order Doctrine
(COHEN V. BENEFICIAL INDUS. LOAN CORP)
At the threshold we are met with the question whether the District Court's order refusing to apply the statute was an appealable one. Title 28 U.S.C. 1291, 28 U.S.C.A. 1291, provides, as did its predecessors, for appeal only 'from all final decisions of the district courts,' except when direct appeal to this Court is provided. Section 1292 allows appeals also from certain interlocutory orders, decrees and judgments, not material to this case except as they indicate the purpose to allow appeals from orders other than final judgments when they have a final and irreparable effect on the rights of the parties. It is obvious that, if Congress had allowed appeals only from those final judgments which terminate an action, this order would not be appealable. [337 U.S. 541 , 546] The effect of the statute is to disallow appeal from any decision which is tentative, informal or incomplete. Appeal gives the upper court a power of review, not one of intervention. So long as the matter remains open, unfinished or inconclusive, there may be no intrusion by appeal. But the District Court's action upon this application was concluded and closed and its decision final in that sense before the appeal was taken.
Nor does the statute permit appeals, even from fully consummated decisions, where they are but steps towards final judgment in which they will merge. The purpose is to combine in one review all stages of the proceeding that effectively may be reviewed and corrected if and when final judgment results. But this order of the District Court did not make any step toward final disposition of the merits of the case and will not be merged in final judgment. When that time comes, it will be too late effectively to review the present order and the rights conferred by the statute, if it is applicable, will have been lost, probably irreparably. We conclude that the matters embraced in the decision appealed from are not of such an interlocutory nature as to affect, or to be affected by, decision of the merits of this case.
This decision appears to fall in that small class which finally determine claims of right separable from, and collateral to, rights asserted in the action, too important to be denied review and too independent of the cause itself to require that appellate consideration be deferred until the whole case is adjudicated. The Court has long given this provision of the statute this practical rather than a technical construction. Bank of Columbia v. Sweeney, 1 Pet. 567, 569; United States v. River Rouge Improvement Co., 269 U.S. 411, 414 , 145; Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323, 328 , 542.
We hold this order appealable because it is a final disposition of a claimed right which is not an ingredient [337 U.S. 541 , 547] of the cause of action and does not require considerat on with it. But we do not mean that every order fixing security is subject to appeal. Here it is the right to security that presents a serious and unsettled question. If the right were admitted or clear and the order involved only an exercise of discretion as to the amount of security, a matter the statute makes subject to reconsideration from time to time, appealability would present a different question.
Since this order may be reviewed on appeal, the petition in No. 512, whereby
the corporation asserts the right to compel security by mandamus, is dismissed.
COHEN V. BENEFICIAL INDUS. LOAN CORP. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949)
June 20, 1949
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thomas - Legislative Information on the
Internet |
Check
Your Credit Score
Directory of Medical Dictionaries: Table of Contents |
California Injury (Torts) Law
USA Entertainment.US |
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com
|
United Statea News
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com
|
iLaw
Dictionary.Com | Library of Congress
United States Law Consumer Law TITLE PAGE |
USA Entertainment.US
iBusiness Center.US |
United States Law: Constitutional Law: Constitutions of The World:
TITLE PAGE
California
Contracts Law.Com |
California Injury (Torts) Law
Phone Directories From Around the World New |
California Law Revision Commission
California Civil
Procedure.Com |
Federal
Civil Procedure.Com
Copyright 2003 by
™©
- iLawDictionary.Com™© All Rights Reserved